On February 28 the Supreme Court of the United States did what many legal experts thought improbable: it decided to consider Donald Trump’s arguments that American presidents are immune from criminal prosecution for any acts committed while they are in office.
That is, in effect, that presidents’ behaviors while in office are beyond the
reach of our laws, that the Rule of Law–the bulwark of our democracy that asserts that laws apply equally to everyone without fear, favor, or position–is simply suspended for the most powerful individuals in the nation, that in fact presidents do enjoy the rank privileges of monarchs and despots. The nation’s founding generation fought a war to ensure against this result.
One would think that the Court’s justices would cringe at such a notion, not least because it suggests that they themselves could be vulnerable to the punitive machinations of an angry president. As the old boxing saying goes, protect yourselves at all times, men and women of the Court! Continue reading “The US Supreme Court Cannibalizes Its Own Legitimacy”





experience certainly did not seem in line with the Resurrection story.
witnesses despite a federal court order to not tamper with the legal process and its personnel, including potential witnesses.
conform language to the needs of a society’s authoritarian leadership to maintain control of its population. Newspeak is a minimalist language designed to make the utterance of heretical thoughts–those that challenge central authority–impossible.  Doublethink refers to the ability to believe and say that black is white, in contradiction of plain facts, in order to uphold the regime.